Pipeline Spill Adds To Concerns About Dakota Access Pipeline

Dec 15, 2016
Originally published on December 16, 2016 1:16 pm

For months, the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and others in North Dakota mounted a massive protest against the controversial Dakota Access pipeline, in part over concerns that any leak could contaminate their drinking water.

Now they are watching the Belle Fourche pipeline, which recently leaked roughly 180,000 gallons of crude into the Ash Coulee Creek in far western North Dakota. The leak was discovered Dec. 5, and authorities say there is no threat to drinking water and that the crude is 100 percent contained.

But cold weather is slowing down the 140 or so workers on the scene cleaning up the mess, according to pipeline company spokeswoman Wendy Owens.

"It's so remote and the terrain is very, very rugged, so it's rough out there," she says.

The leaking segment of the pipeline was built in the 1980s. Since then, construction materials and pressure monitoring equipment have improved, and tighter regulations have been put in place.

"It's hard to compare one company, especially one that has had a pipeline in the ground for maybe 40 or 50 years, to a brand new pipeline," says Carl Weimer, executive director of the nonprofit Pipeline Safety Trust. "It's not just the old ones that fail, new ones can fail also."

And they do. Since 2010, according to data from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, operators have reported about 200 crude oil spills per year, on average. Most of them are comparatively small — think a few bathtubs full or less. The Belle Fourche pipeline leak is the largest in North Dakota since 2013. But the same company that owns and runs the pipeline was involved in another oil spill in Montana in 2015 that leaked 30,000 gallons of crude into the river. At one point, tests showed traces of oil in the local drinking water.

Still, generally these incidents are low probability, high impact events, and John Stoody with the Association of Oil Pipelines says they remain the most efficient way to go.

"They're also the safest way to move crude oil and petroleum around," he says.

The data to back up that claim are kind of tricky to pin down. But when you compare crude transportation by pipeline versus crude transported by rail, pipelines appear safer. That's because while pipelines spill about 50 percent more than trains, they move more than three times as much crude.

Elizabeth Herdes, a Denver-based lawyer focusing on pipeline safety, agrees that pipelines are the safest way to transport crude but points out that this doesn't tell the whole story.

"I think it is somewhat cold comfort to those who are actually experiencing an incident in their backyard," Herdes says. "Much like if we talked about, if you're driving a car, and we know it's safer to drive a car now because there's airbags and all of these safety things. But if you're the one in the car accident, it doesn't seem any safer."

Those who have been protesting the Dakota Access pipeline worry that safety equipment won't detect a leak, and this recent spill gives them pause because it wasn't pipeline safety equipment that detected 180,000 gallons crude leaking out of the pipeline, but a local landowner.

Leigh Paterson is with Inside Energy, a public media collaboration focused on America's energy issues.

Copyright 2016 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

For months, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others in North Dakota mounted a massive protest against the controversial Dakota Access oil pipeline, in part over concerns that any leak could contaminate drinking water. Now they are watching a different North Dakota pipeline that recently leaked crude into a creek. Inside Energy's Leigh Paterson reports on these risks.

LEIGH PATERSON, BYLINE: The leak in the Belle Fourche pipeline was discovered in far western North Dakota. Roughly 180,000 gallons have been spilled, much of it into the Ash Coulee Creek. Authorities say there is no threat to drinking water and that the crude is 100 percent contained. As for the efforts to clean up this mess...

WENDY OWENS: It is extremely cold.

PATERSON: That's pipeline company spokeswoman Wendy Owens, who says the weather is slowing down workers on the scene.

OWENS: It's so remote and the terrain is very, very rugged, so it's rough out there.

PATERSON: The leaking segment of the pipeline was built in the 1980s. Since then, construction materials and pressure monitoring equipment has improved and tighter regulations have been put in place.

CARL WEIMER: And it's hard to, you know, compare one company, especially that's had a pipeline in the ground for maybe 40 or 50 years now, to a brand new pipeline.

PATERSON: Carl Weimer is with a nonprofit called the Pipeline Safety Trust.

WEIMER: It's not just the old pipelines that fail. New ones can fail also.

PATERSON: And they do. Since 2010, according to federal data, operators have reported around 200 crude oil spills per year on average. Most of them are comparatively small, think a few bathtubs full or less. The Belle Fourche pipeline leak is the largest in North Dakota since 2013.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

BRIAN WILLIAMS: Difficult mission unfolding tonight on the Yellowstone River, a large oil spill that has dumped toxic chemicals into the water.

PATERSON: That's NBC's Brian Williams describing an oil spill in Montana in 2015 that leaked an estimated 30,000 gallons of crude into the river. At one point, tests showed traces of oil in the local drinking water. And that pipeline is operated by the same company that runs Belle Fourche. Now, generally, these incidents are low probability, high impact events. And John Stoody, with the Association of Oil Pipelines, says they remain the most efficient way to go.

JOHN STOODY: They're also the safest way to move crude oil and petroleum around.

PATERSON: The data to back up that claim are kind of tricky to pin down. But when you compare crude transported by pipeline versus crude transported by rail, pipelines appear safer. That's because while pipelines spill about 50 percent more than trains, they move more than three times as much crude. Elizabeth Herdes is a Denver-based attorney focusing on pipeline safety. She says that while that's true, it doesn't tell the whole story.

ELIZABETH HERDES: I think it's somewhat cold comfort to those who are actually experiencing an incident in their backyard, much like if we talked about if you're driving a car and, you know, we know it's safer to drive a car now because there's airbags and all these safety things. But if you're the one in the car accident, it doesn't seem any safer.

PATERSON: Those that have been protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline worry that safety equipment won't detect a leak. And this recent spill gives them pause because it wasn't pipeline safety equipment that detected the 180,000 gallons of crude leaking out of the pipeline, it was a local landowner. For NPR News, I'm Leigh Paterson.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

GREENE: Leigh Paterson, part of Inside Energy, a public media collaboration focusing on America's energy issues. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.